Contents
|
Robert
Hackshaw, (1653–1722) “The
Orange Skipper”
By
Fiona Martin
Introduction
1. Robert Hackshaw
(1653–1722) was a London merchant and Dissenter who
played a prominent role in North American colonial affairs. He may also
have been involved in the secret negotiations prior to the Glorious
Revolution of 1688.
He was the son of Robert Hackshaw (c1625–16741),
“citizen and grocer of London”2 and his wife Sarah (1630-753) the daughter of John Smart, a merchant tailor,
landowner and Common Councilman.4
The Hackshaws may have come to London from Cumberland via Somerset5 . The links between the Taylors
of Ongar and the Hackshaws are underlined by the fact that Jane
Jefferys, Sarah Hackshaw Taylor (wife of the first Isaac), Charles
Taylor and several other members of the family were buried in the
Hackshaw family tomb in Bunhill Fields Burial Ground6.
2. Robert Hackshaw is the
most intriguing of the Hackshaw family. Josiah Gilbert, in his
introductory note to the autobiography of his mother, the former Ann
Taylor (1782-1866) [The
Autobiography and Other Memorials of Mrs Gilbert, Formerly Ann Taylor,
ed Josiah Gilbert,1874], wrote:
"The Hackshaws (or Hawkshaws) were either of Dutch extraction, or
belonged to the Puritan emigration in Holland, for [Robert Hackshaw]
was purveyor to King William III, and came over with him to England. He
was called the 'Orange skipper', from having been employed, before the
Revolution, to carry dispatches backwards and forwards, concealed in
his walking-cane."
Josiah Gilbert appears to be recounting an oral tradition in his family that may not be entirely accurate.
3. There are, confusingly,
at least four generations of Hackshaws called
Robert. The first was probably born before 1630 and died in 1674; the
second was born in 1653 and died in 1722. His sons included Robert
(about 1675-May 18, 1738), whose son Robert, christened on October 24,
1704, in the parish of St Stephen, Coleman Street, died on September 1,
1713, (before his father). A grandson of the first Robert (son of his
elder son John) was also called Robert.
In this article, references to “Robert” without further clarification
are to the second Robert (d 1722).
Dutch connections
4. Josiah Gilbert believed that, "The Hackshaws (or Hawkshaws)
were
either of Dutch extraction, or belonged to the Puritan emigration in
Holland”. The Hackshaw family certainly had close links to the Dutch
community in London. Robert’s daughter Sarah married Gerard
Vanheythuysen, who was the godson and probably greatnephew of the man
of the same name , “borne in Waert in Brabant”, declared naturalised on April 25, 1663.7
His father, also Gerard, was the first Gerard’s executor. Through the
Vanheythuysens the Hackshaws were also related to the Lodwicks
[Lodewyks] and Delboes.8
Similarly, through the Smarts they were related to the family of John
Lethieullier (1591–1679) also from Brabant, later one of London’s
richest merchant families. Robert’s cousin Elizabeth Smart was the wife
of John Lethieullier junior,9 while another cousin,
Elizabeth Hackshaw married into the Silvesters.10 For the Silvesters’ Dutch origins see House of Commons Journal Volume 7,
February 7, 1656.
But there is no evidence that the Hackshaws were themselves Dutch.
Rather, records tend to suggest that there had been Hackshaws in London
from as early as 1583.11 Robert’s father was a London grocer, and two
merchant businesses are listed in the 1677 London trade directory in
the name of Hagshaw.
The only (rather weak) evidence that Robert was part of the “Puritan
emigration in Holland” (as Josiah put it) is that there appear to be no
English records of baptisms for Robert’s children, nor of his marriage
to their mother, suggesting that he might have been abroad at that
time. He certainly visited Holland later: on May 18, 1696, he was
issued with a pass to go to Holland12 (with “Mr Moses de Casarez,
Stephen Mason, Quintus Spencer, and one servant”).
Purveyor to the King
5. The Hackshaws do, as Josiah Gilbert claims, seem to have been
royal
suppliers during William’s reign. Warrant books record that Robert was
a major supplier to the armed forces for campaigns in Canada and the
Low Countries in 1710-11: Bills13 drawn by Col. Arnott on July 24, 1711,
“upon account of the late Expedition to Canada” include payments to
“....Mr Hackshaw, due Oct. 22 for £714.5.8 … and
£1,000.0.0.” On
March 17, 1701, Joseph Paice, John Champante and Robert Hackshaw
proposed14 to the Lords of the Treasury “for remittance to New York for
the pay of the forces by their joint bills of exchange, at an advance
of 34l. per cent”.
Activities at sea
6. Josiah
Gilbert’s claim that Robert Hackshaw was a “skipper” points
to his shipping activity. His role was, however, as a ship owner and
merchant, not a captain. London shipping records in Port Books list
many consignments, mostly of cloth, to both the Netherlands and North
America.
After 1697 London records are missing but other port records show that
he was still active: on April 15, 1705, his galley, the Greyhound was
bound from Cowes to New York15; in November 1711 he
had a consignment in the Dove of London bound from Plymouth for New
York16 and in February 1715 the same ship was
bound from Southampton to New York.17
Colonial trade
7. Robert also had
considerable investments in the North American
colonies. He had been admitted (with his brother John) to the Skinners
Company on March 20, 1677 (ie 1678 New Style). One of his trading
partners in the fur trade in colonial New York was Robert Livingston
the Elder18 (1654-1725), a member of the council of New York and
secretary for Indian affairs, a dissenting Scot who had grown up in
exile in Holland, who had met Robert in Lisbon.
Robert Hackshaw was also a member19 of the statutory Greenland Company
set up under the 1692: “Act for the regaining encourageing and settling
the Greenland Trade”.
8. In 1691-92 Robert
became a founder member and Treasurer of the West
Jersey Society, a stock company composed of 48 members, mostly London
residents. West Jersey Proprietor Doctor Daniel Coxe, who had purchased
about one-fifth of its territory, conveyed to the Society its first
large tract of land. Their holdings were surveyed into farm lots, and
their agent leased farms and collected rents on their behalf.20
In 1692 Robert signed the petition of proprietors of the Provinces in
East and West Jersey in America, “praying to enjoy the liberty of their
own ports against the pretences of the collector of New York who
enforces ships bound to the East and West Jerseys to unload or pay
Customs there [in New York] which is illegal and discourages their
trade.”21
On December 24, 1692, on the instructions of the committee he wrote a
letter from London to Jeremiah Basse, their agent to complain “of
receiving no news; intend to purchase Dr Coxe's remaining third of
land; have bo't of him 4,000 acres at Cohanzey or Salem Tenth side;
wine and brandy to be made; settlements at Cape May to be encouraged”.22
9. In both 1699 and 1700
he
signed pro-trade petitions to Parliament complaining about the
behaviour of the Governor of New York, the Earl of Bellomont.
“By his illegal proceedings, he has put such further hardships on the
merchants and other the King's subjects there that, without redress,
the petitioners must be forced to withhold their trade thither,
especially being informed by … inhabitants of that place [of] … his
several arbitrary and unjust proceedings”.23
In reply, the Governor, in Boston suffering from gout, accused Robert
of harbouring pirates: “Since my leaving New York one of the four Ships
has come in that went from thence to Madagascar last Summer and of
which I informed your Lordships, and has brought Sixty Pyrates and a
vast deall of Treasure. I hear that every one of the Pyrates paid 150lb
for his passage, and the owners, I am told, have cleared thirty
Thousand pounds by this Voyage. It is observable that Mr Hackshaw, one
of the Merchants that petitioned against me to your Lordships, and
Stephen Delancy, a hot headed saucy Frenchman and Mr. Hackshaw's
Correspondent, are the cheife owners of this Ship. I hear there were
200 Pyrates at Madagascar when this Ship came away, who intended to
take their passage in Frederick Phillips Ship and the other Two
belonging to New York.”24
In another letter Bellomont repeated this claim: “The most
prominent and opulent merchants in the city – De Lancey and Philipse
among them – accumulated much of their wealth by piracy. Shelly is one
of the Masters of Ships that I formerly informed your Lordships went
last Summer from New York to Madagascar; he is a dweller at New Yorke,
and Mr Hackshaw one of the Merchants in London that petitioned your
Lordships against me is one of his owners, and Mr de Lancey a Frenchman
at New Yorke is another. I hear too that Captain Kidd dropped some
pirates in that Island. They write from New Yorke that Arabian Gold is
in great plenty there. When Frederick Phillipp's ship and the other two
come from Madagascar (which are expected every day) New York will
abound with gold. Tis the most beneficiall trade that to Madagascar
with the pirates that was ever heard of, and I believe there's more got
that way than by turning pirates and robbing.”25
10. Later Robert was
active in South Carolina, signing a petition26 to
revoke the Proprietary Charter in favour of a Royal Charter.
But his business was often precarious. The risk of loss of shipping to
foreign vessels, pirates or shipwreck was compounded by what merchants
saw as unfairly heavy taxation in the colonies and the uncertainty of
being paid by the Treasury paymasters. There was also a major court
case in 1711 over business interests [Samuel Lillie v David Waterhouse,
Robert Hackshaw and Robert Hackshaw C 10/528/37 1711].
Links to the 1688 Revolution
11. A business in
White Hart Court (“a pretty good open Place, well
inhabited by Wholesale Dealers”) is listed in the 1677 London Directory
in the name of Rob Hagshaw27 (sic).
Robert was, however, unlike his brother, not a Common Councilman. His
absence from City politics could be a sign that he was often abroad on
business, possibly, as Josiah Gilbert claims, secretly carrying
dispatches to and from Holland before the Revolution. There is unlikely
to be any written evidence as to this clandestine activity. But of
great significance is his arrest in 1685 in connection with the import
of subversive pamphlets from Holland.
State Papers for January 168528 record the arrest and subsequent release
of a merchant, Robert Hackshaw, in connection with the spreading of
seditious libels in documents imported by ship from Amsterdam about the
death in the Tower of the Earl of Essex in the wake of the Rye House
Plot. On January 5 a warrant was issued to Thomas Atterbury, messenger,
to search for Robert Hackshaw, a merchant, and to seize him with his
papers and bring him before the Earl of Sunderland, or Roger
L'Estrange, to be examined concerning what shall be objected against
him concerning the dispersing of treasonable and dangerous libels.
By January 13 it was reported that: “Last Saturday Mr Norden, master of
a ship, was taken off the Exchange for bringing from Amsterdam a great
number of libels relating to the death of the Earl of Essex and on
Sunday Mr Cornish, Mr Hacshaw (sic) and some others were taken up by a
messenger concerning the said libel. They two were discharged but the
others are still in custody.”
There is no explanation for his release; it can only have been for lack
of firm evidence linking him to the documents imported on what was
probably one of his ships. Later, Robert was an active member of a
London Whig club.29
Robert’s known political allegiance may be the reason why Francis
Francia, the defendant in a 1717 Treason trial (about a Jacobite
conspiracy) objected to Robert being a member of the jury.30
A dissenter
12. Robert was certainly
committed to Protestantism and Dissent.
Records show that he was a member (with his cousin Humphrey) of
Congregational Churches in London (for example, present at “Mr Tonys
Meeting 17 Dec' 1695”).31
He left money in his will32 to Pastor Thomas Hall, a dissenting
Minister, and to the poor of his church. The Hackshaws
were also related to the Prince family of Boston: Robert’s son wrote to
his cousin Thomas Prince in August 1723 and 1726.33
Robert was also involved in the publication in London of the American
theologian Cotton Mather’s huge history of Puritan New England, Magnalia Christi Americana. This
was a risky business. Mather had written: "The Booksellers in London
are cold about it" and "The Proposals for Subscriptions, are of an
uncertain and a tedious Event." So in March 1701 news of Robert’s
involvement seemed heaven-sent: “There is one Mr. Robert Hackshaw, a
very serious and Godly man, who proposes to print the Ecclesiastical
History of New England AT HIS OWN CHARGE” [estimated at £600].
“He declared He did it not with any Expectation of Gain to himself, but
for the Glory of God." But publication took a year. It was unclear even
to Mather at the time what had caused the “extreme Hazard of
Miscarrying” but he thought the most likely culprit was Bromfield, his
original contact in London, and his “nice Hummours”.
But from a letter by John Quick (1636–1706) a dissenting Minister who
was involved in the negotiations, it emerges that Robert was less than
totally committed to the immediate printing of the manuscript.34. In the event a bookseller called Parkhurst took charge.
The work was, however, controversial and received mixed reviews from
the start. Cotton continued to correspond with Robert until at least
1706.35
Land in Hoxton
13.
Another connection to
the Dissenters is the fact that Robert lived
in Hoxton Square outside the City. One of the earliest dissenting
academies (founded in 1669) was in Hoxton Square. Hoxton and Charles
Squares, as well as being fashionable neighbourhoods, were centres of
non-conformist sects.
For example Edmund Calamy lived there. Hoxton Square is thought to have
been laid out by Samuel Blewitt and Robert Hackshaw in 168336 and is thought to be one of the oldest squares in
London. In 1683 Robert’s cousin Humphrey Hackshaw leased37 five acres in
Pittfield Close, Hoxton.
In this venture Robert was acting as a property developer: in 1687, for
example, he leased38 a property in the same parish to John Gain. According to tax records39
Robert himself lived in the Outliers district of the parish of St
Leonard, Shoreditch. (His stock value at £400 was the second
highest on the list for the area.)
The fact that his house was in the square itself emerges from an Old
Bailey trial: on February 27, 1734 John Humphries, Plasterer, was
indicted at the Old Bailey for “stealing 200 hundredweight of lead,
fixt to the Freehold of Robert Hackshaw, in Hoxton Square, Feb. 16”,
found guilty and sentenced to transportation.”40
The main witness, Thomas Mead, confirmed that the house was
empty: “On Saturday Morning, my Wife told me, as she came by Mr.
Hackshaw's empty House, which is but 3 Doors from mine, she saw the Bar
of the Cellar-door loose. Then, says I, some Rogues have been stealing
the Leaden-sink in the Kitchen. That would be worse, says she, than
when they stole the Pipes a Year ago. As I had the Key of the House, I
went to examine how it was; I found the Lead of the Sink was taken out,
and laid upon the Floor ready to be carried away. O, thinks I, the
Gentlemen will come to fetch it at Night, and I can't do less than to
give them a Welcome. So I spoke to Robin Ballance to bring his Gun and
to sit up with me that Night, which he did. I went out about 12 but
found nothing stirring. I went again in less than an Hour and heard a
ticking in the Cellar, and by and by a light was struck. I goes home to
my Wife – Her Name is Nanny, says I, now my Chaps are in the House, but
call the Watch – I warrant you the Rogues have got Pistols, if they
have, says I, we'll send the Dog in first and he won't value their
Pistols, for he don't know a Pistol from a Broom-stick. Then Bob shall
go with his Gun, and Fire upon them, and I'll hide myself behind the
Door, till the Danger is over. But all this wou'd not make her easy.
And so being willing to obey my Wife's orders, I ran to the Watch as
fast as if I was running for an Estate, and brought them with me: But
when we came to the Door they were so full of their good breeding, that
they stood disputing who should enter first: I was vext at it, for I
thought their Noise would alarm the Rogues within, and so it proved,
for presently I heard a Window slap to. Now, thinks I, they have made
their Escape Backwards, and I have watch'd all Night for nothing. So I
push'd in foremost, and ran into the Kitchen; I saw no Body at first,
but looking into the Closet, there stood the Prisoner, squeez'd in a
Corner bolt upright, with a Plaisterer's Lathing-hammer in his Hand. I
Knock'd him down, and catch'd him by the Collar as he fell. His Head
run with Blood, and I was sorry to see it; but I thought it was better
so, than he should serve me worse with his Hammer. I took the Hammer
from him – Here it is – And this Knife, but it is not worth a Fill of a
Farthing. When I had pull'd him out and secur'd him, the Watch came in
to my Assistance.”
14. This was very
probably the house where Robert’s granddaughter Sarah
was living before her marriage to Josiah Jefferys in 1728. As recounted
by Josiah Gilbert, “Josiah Jefferys had, at the age of eighteen,
married a Miss Hackshaw, aged sixteen, as she was on her way to market.”
[Hoxton Market is very close]
Her father, then a man of substance, with a rent roll from an estate
near Raleigh of £1000 per annum, was extremely angry, and told
her that, being his child, he would not turn her out of doors, but that
if she ever went beyond them she should never return. Upon these
strange terms she remained two years under his roof, when her brother
interceded, and persuaded her father to set the young husband up in
business as a cutler, in which, as appears above, he prospered. Her
father, on the contrary [Robert’s son] … after mortgaging his estate,
fell further into misfortune, and died of grief.”
Robert junior’s money worries emerge clearly from his 1738 will,
written at a time when Robert’s own estate had still not been settled.
[See below]
Other Hackshaw merchants
15. Robert’s older
brother John and his cousins Alan (Alling) and
Humphrey (sons of Robert’s uncle Humphrey Hackshaw) were also
successful merchants. John, like Robert, was a member of the Skinner’s
company; his wine merchant’s business, Hagshaw (sic) and Turner was
listed in the 1677 directory in Suffolk Lane.
John served as a Common Councilman in the 1680s.* [*The Rulers of
London 1660-1689 Woodhead 1966] but left London in around 1700,
probably for the West Indies. In July 1707 he was appointed to the
Royal Commission on St Kitts*, but by November that year was reported
to have died there. [*Calendar of State Papers Colonial, America and
West Indies, Volume 23: 1706-1708 (1916), pp. 494-518, pp. 602-614].
Alan was a “citizen and fishmonger”*.[*Prob/11/449)] Humphrey, a
vintner left* stock in the Bank of England and the East India Company.
[*Prob 11/574]
Robert Hackshaw’s will
16. Robert
Hackshaw’s will dated June 16, 172241
describes him as being “of Chiswell Street in the parish of St Giles
Cripplegate”. It refers to his wife’s property interest in an Inn at
Little Moorfields and to land that he had purchased in Hockley and
Raleigh in Essex (the latter – in his son Robert’s name – was never to
be sold).
He mentions his wife Sarah, three sons, Robert [d 1738],
Edward [Hoxton sugarbaker d 1726] and Richard, and his daughter
Elizabeth. Only Robert and Edward were named executors; in fact Richard
was cut out of his inheritance, Robert providing instead for Richard’s
children. His explanation was that, “whereas I have not only given to
my son Richard Hackshaw a portion but have also paid for him or lost by
him about one thousand pounds which I hereby forgive him, my will is
that he shall have not further part or share of my estate save only
that I give to him ... twenty pounds for himself and to his son Richard
and his three daughters his children’s money to remain in the hands of
my executors till they come to age or are married ...”
Robert realised that
there would be problems with the will: “Whereas my estate consists of
sundry particulars which may occasion disputes amount my children ...
my
dying charge to them all is never to go to law about dividing my estate
but if they cannot agree among themselves that they trust two or three
persons and stand and abide by their arbitration or award.”
17. As Robert
feared, his will was disputed, and it was not until August
18. 1768 (more than 40 years later) that Elizabeth was authorised
to administer
the will. His sons Edward and Robert had died, then John Buckle (one of
Robert junior’s executors) had died, and Robert junior’s other
executors Robert Lewin and William Stevens renounced their
executorship, so Elizabeth had the unenviable job.42
18. The will43 of his son
Robert “of the
parish of St Stephen Coleman Street” had also been contested. This was
partly because of the outstanding issues with Robert’s own will. Robert
junior clearly had many outstanding debts: he suggested that his
executors should persuade his creditors to accept “ten shillings in the
pound” in final settlement. On the credit side, as well as money owing
him from members of his family, there were matters outstanding with
contacts in New England, and money due from a Mr Busby’s estate (of
which he was a beneficiary).
He attempted by his will to get the
beneficiaries of his father’s will to reach a settlement. This was
never going to be easy. His approach was dictatorial rather than
consensual: for example, he specified that his daughter should benefit
“for her separate means and not to be intermeddled with by her husband”
(Josiah Jefferys). Shortly after making the will he also drew up a most
extraordinary codicil setting out his wishes, including detailed
instructions on the conversion of a warehouse by adding new windows and
shutters, replacing locks, and “knocking down the partition between the
stable and the warehouse provided Mr Jackson’s partition above it can
be well supported without it”.
This must have made the executors’ task
extremely difficult. But there was apparently no evidence that he had
been of unsound mind at the time. The same year there was a judgement44
in favour of John Buckle, an executor, (who was possibly his wife’s
brother) upholding the validity of both the will and the codicil
against the claim of Josiah Jefferys on behalf of his wife, Robert
junior’s daughter.
The younger Robert’s will was
also not settled until 1768 when his granddaughter Sarah Taylor was
appointed to administer the estate. This sorry story is consistent with
Josiah Gilbert’s claim in his introduction to Ann Gilbert’s
autobiography that Robert junior “died of grief”.
19. There is
circumstantial evidence that the first Isaac Taylor benefited
substantially from that settlement, since in 1770, he was wealthy
enough to buy the business of the successful booksellers and
publishers A. and Henry Webley45 and, at around the same time, to
lose the enormous sum of £1000 in supporting John Wilkes without ruining himself.46 It seems very
unlikely that wealth on this scale would have been acquired from his
work as an engraver alone.
Notes
1. Prob 11/345 2. Admitted to the Grocers’ Company in
1646 after apprenticeship to Joseph Alfred. 3. Prob 11/348 4. The Rulers of London 1660-1689.
Woodhead 1966 5. Heralds’ Visitation of Somersetshire 6. Suffolk Record
Office HD 588/1/40, HD 588/1/49 7. PRO C 204/58 Prob11/414 8. Prob 11/468, Prob 11/211, Prob 11/308, Prob
11/352
9. Prob 11/567 10. Alan’s will
Prob/11/449 11. DE/Bw/28223 dated November 10, 1583
Hertfordshire Archives 12. Calendar of State
Papers Domestic: William III, 1696 (1913), pp. 157-209 13. Treasury Warrant Book: April 1712, 11-19 14. Calendar of Treasury Papers, Volume 3: 1702-1707
(1874), pp. 1-20 15. PRO E 190/847/3 16. PRO E 190/1070/12 17. PRO E 190/857/4 18. Lawrence H. Leder,
Robert Livingston, 1654-1728: And the Politics of Colonial New York 19. Statutes of the Realm: volume 6: 1685-94
(1819), pp. 405-410 20. Roxanne K. Carkhuff New Jersey Genealogical Magazine, Vol.70, p.126;
Edwin Platt Tanner The Province of New Jersey 1664-1738 Page 17 21. Calendar of State Papers Domestic: William and Mary, 1691-2
(1900), pp. 344-393; see also Calendar of Treasury Books, Volume 11:
1696-1697 (1933), pp. 414-425 22. West Jersey Records – Liber B, Part 1 23. Calendar of State Papers Colonial, America and West Indies, Volume 18: 1700 (1910), pp. 64-73
24. PRO, CO. 5:860, no. 62; Commons Journal,
XIII, 18-19 25. Singleton, Dutch New
York 339 26. John
Wesley Brinsfield, Religion and Politics in Colonial South Carolina 27. Lee and Major A collection of the
names of the merchants living in and around London 1677 28. Calendar of State Papers Domestic:
Charles II, 1684-5 (1938), pp. 271-306 29. Horwitz et al London Politics 1713-1717 page 90. 30. Thomas
Bayly Howell A Complete Collection
of State Trials and Proceedings for High Treason ... to the Year 1783,
page 902 31. Congregational Historical Society
Transactions 136 32. Prob 11/588 33. Chester Noyes
Greenough Collected Studies
footnote 286 34. Letter set out verbatim in Chester Noyes Greenough Collected Studies
138–139 35. Chester Noyes Greenough Collected Studies footnote 286; Wendell
Cotton Mather The puritan priest 36. Survey of
London page 74 37. London Metropolitan Archives Q/HAL/230 17th
Dec 1683 38. Parish
of Saint Leonard, Shoreditch Q/UL/A4/95-107 39. Four Shillings In The Pound Aid
1693/94 40. Old Bailey website 41. Prob 11/588 42. Marginal note Prob
11/588 43. Prob 11/693, 185 44. Prob 11/693, 344 45. E. Harris, British Architectural Books and Writers,
1556-1785 (1990) 46. Autobiography of Mrs Gilbert, vol. I, p.184]
April 2009 |